Promoting Enduring Peace presented its Gandhi Peace Award jointly to renowned consumer advocate Ralph Nader and BDS founder Omar Barghouti on April 23, 2017.
Between The Lines' coverage and resource compilation of the Resistance Movement
Email us with your mailing address at email@example.com to receive our "Resist Trump/Resist Hate" car window cling!
See our thank you gifts for your donation and/or BTL Weekly Summary subscription. Be sure to send us an email of where we can send you our Resist Trump/Resist Hate window cling to firstname.lastname@example.org or email@example.com
who helped make our 25th anniversary with Jeremy Scahill a success!
For those who missed the event, or were there and really wanted to fully absorb its import, here it is in video
"How Do We Build A Mass Movement to Reverse Runaway Inequality?" with Les Leopold, author of "Runaway Inequality: An Activist's Guide to Economic Justice,"May 22, 2016, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, The City University of New York, 860 11th Ave. (Between 58th and 59th), New York City. Between The Lines' Scott Harris and Richard Hill moderated this workshop. Listen to the audio/slideshows and more from this workshop.
Listen to audio of the plenary sessions from the weekend.
Listen to the full interview (30:33) with Jeremy Scahill, an award-winning investigative journalist with the Nation Magazine, correspondent for Democracy Now! and author of the bestselling book, "Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army," about America's outsourcing of its military. In an exclusive interview with Counterpoint's Scott Harris on Sept. 16, 2013, Scahill talks about his latest book, "Dirty Wars, The World is a Battlefield," also made into a documentary film under the same title, and was nominated Dec. 5, 2013 for an Academy Award in the Best Documentary Feature category.
Between The Lines' Executive Producer Scott Harris hosts a live,
weekly talk show,
Counterpoint, from which some of Between The Lines'
interviews are excerpted. Listen every Monday evening from 8 to 10 p.m.
EDT at www.WPKN.org
(Follows the 5-7 minute White Rose Calendar.)
Counterpoint in its entirety is archived after midnight ET Monday nights, and is available for at least a year following broadcast in WPKN Radio's Archives.
You can also listen to full unedited interview segments from Counterpoint, which are generally available some time the day following broadcast.
Subscribe to Counterpoint bulletins via our subscriptions page.
"The Rogue World Order: Connecting the Dots Between Trump, Flynn, Bannon, Spencer, Dugin Putin," by Anna Manzo (GlobalHealing), Daily Kos, Feb. 13, 2017
"Widespread Resistance Begins to Trump's Muslim Travel Ban at U.S. Airports," by Anna Manzo (GlobalHealing), Daily Kos, Jan. 28, 2017
"MSNBC Editor: Women's March is a Revival of the Progressive Movement," by Anna Manzo (GlobalHealing), Daily Kos, Jan. 24, 2017
"Cornering Trump," by Reginald Johnson, Jan. 19, 2017
"Free Leonard Peltier," by Reginald Johnson, Jan. 6, 2016
"For Natives, a "Day of Mourning"by Reginald Johnson, November 23, 2016
"A Bitter Harvest" by Reginald Johnson, Nov. 15, 2016
A compilation of activist and news sites with a progressive point of view
If you have other questions regarding subscriptions, feeds or podcasts/mp3s go to our Audio Help page.
Learn how to support our efforts!Tweets by @BTLRadioNews
Posted Sept. 21, 2016
Former presidential candidate and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders called climate change the most urgent threat to national security, but most government officials – and most peace activists – don't necessarily make the connection between the havoc that the climate crisis is already creating and will create in the future on the issues of peace and security. One glaring example is the drought in Syria, which pushed tens of thousands of Syrians off their land and into the cities, exacerbating conflicts which precipitated the civil war that has raged for the past five-and-a-half years, killing up to 500,000 Syrians and displacing millions more.
One group that does make that connection is the Traprock Center for Peace and Justice in Greenfield, Massachusetts. The center's Director Pat Hynes spoke earlier this month to a meeting in Connecticut that was co-sponsored by Promoting Enduring Peace and the Connecticut chapter of 350.org]], which brought peace and climate activists together. Hynes is a retired professor of Urban Environmental Health, and has worked for decades as an educator, researcher, writer and activist on issues of environmental justice, feminism and the health effects of war.
PATRICIA HYNES: The U.S. military is the largest institutional user of oil in the world, and the largest institutional contributor to climate change. The key book, which came out a few years ago, The Green Zone by Barry Sanders, is probably the only book so far written by an author who has tried to ferret out documentation in terms of the amount of oil used by the Pentagon. His conclusion is that the Pentagon contributes five percent of emissions to climate change, but there are some caveats there – and no other institution contributes five percent of the global emissions to climate change. He said that with jet fuel – the Air Force uses one-quarter of the jet fuel that’s used throughout the world – that jet fuel has the capacity to contribute up to three times the amount of carbon dioxide equivalent in its emissions, and it’s because of the particular types of emissions from jet fuel and the impact they have on climate change, so actually he considers five percent an underestimate.
Also, his analysis does not include the mining, manufacturing of materials, metal materials, the testing and transport of everything that goes into their planes and tanks and ships by the military industrial complex. So what I want to do is be more inclusive in terms of the contribution of militarization not only in this country, but in the effect we have on the world through foreign policy. His analysis does not include, for example, the NATO nations, which our government badgers to build up their contribution of military budget to NATO, so pushing countries to build their military budgets to be equivalent to two percent of their country budgets. And that means they, too, scaling up with respect to all these military planes, ships, tanks, and the manufacture and testing of them in war games, etc. – all of this contributing more in terms of militarization and warming.
And then also, I spoke about this yesterday – the new Cold War tensions which the military historian Michael Klare has written about recently among what he calls the Great Powers – those being China, the U.S. and Russia. So the new Cold War tensions among these great powers – which then causes the buildup of militaries in all these countries, plus war games. And there’s an increase, of course, in war games we are conducting with Asian partners in our pivot to Asia to surround China.
And just to give an example from one war that we have conducted: This is information from Oil Change International, a research group, has collected and put together. First of all, this is just one war, the Iraq War. The full cost of the Iraq War, which has been estimated at $3 trillion – that money would have covered all of the global investments in renewable power generation needed between the time they did the report around 2007 through 2030, to reverse global warming trends. So another point about militarism and war and climate change is the trade-off point. If you are dedicating 52 percent of your discretionary budget, as we are doing in the U.S., to the Pentagon and to all of the activities I’ve talked about, the military industrial complex as well. If we are dedicating that percent of our budget, we are then taking it away from all other aspects of the discretionary budget – health, education, welfare, housing, environmental protection, climate change research, transportation, etc.
Another piece they’ve done as a way of analysis in terms of militarism being an engine of climate change is that rebuilding Iraqi schools, homes, bridges, businesses, roads and hospitals pulverized by the war, as well as new security walls and barriers would require millions of tons of cement; cement is one of the biggest industrial sources of greenhouse gas emissions.
BETWEEN THE LINES: Patricia Hynes, there’s been a lot written about how the Pentagon is such a big promoter within the federal government of the need to address climate change, and how it’s taking the lead in that regard.
PATRICIA HYNES: First, the greening of the Pentagon, I would compare to a whitened sepulcher. There is nothing that they can do that would possibly affect the damage that so much of our resources dedicated to militarism and war do. That said, most of the greening of the Pentagon would involve putting solar and wind into bases that they have for electricity, and research on alternative fuels. Forty dollars of military conduct of war for every dollar of greening; that was data from 2010.
BETWEEN THE LINES: You said in your talk that you address groups concerned about peace and groups concerned about climate change, but you rarely address a group that's concerned about both.
PATRICIA HYNES: I think we’d make more progress and much faster progress if we brought them together. As someone in the audience said as I was speaking, we work politically in silos. And so, I think there’s much more power in grassroots groups working in partnership together, which does not mean that we all do the same thing. It’s that we support each other’s issues; we continue to make the connections between them and build bridges between them, so that we have a larger and larger base of activism against war and on behalf of mitigating climate change and becoming a renewable country.