Many Ways to Support Between The Lines' Bringing Progressive Voices to More Listeners

With Google's, Facebook's and the Trump administration's attacks on "fake news" that threaten long-standing, independent media resources like Between The Lines, we are facing new challenges. From keeping up with technological changes, to the the FCC plans to dismantle Net Neutrality and allow right-wing Sinclair TV (aka "Trump TV") in 72 percent of U.S. households, we need your support as we continue to raise another $1000 by the end of this year.

Please donate now to help keep progressive voices and viewpoints on the airwaves. See our thank you gifts for your donation.

SPECIAL REPORT: Mic Check, Dec. 12, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: Resistance Roundtable, Dec. 9, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: On Tyranny - one year later, Nov. 28, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: Mic Check, Nov. 12, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: Resistance Roundtable, Nov. 11, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: Rainy Day Radio, Nov. 7, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: Rainy Day Radio, Nov. 7, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: Resisting U.S. JeJu Island military base in South Korea, Oct. 24, 2017

The Resistance Starts Now!

Between The Lines' coverage and resource compilation of the Resistance Movement

2017 Gandhi Peace Awards

Promoting Enduring Peace presented its Gandhi Peace Award jointly to renowned consumer advocate Ralph Nader and BDS founder Omar Barghouti on April 23, 2017.

Subscribe to our Weekly Summary & receive our FREE Resist Trump window cling

resist (Car window cling)

Email us with your mailing address at to receive our "Resist Trump/Resist Hate" car window cling!


who helped make our 25th anniversary with Jeremy Scahill a success!

For those who missed the event, or were there and really wanted to fully absorb its import, here it is in video

Jeremy Scahill keynote speech, part 1 from PROUDEYEMEDIA on Vimeo.

Jeremy Scahill keynote speech, part 2 from PROUDEYEMEDIA on Vimeo.

Between The Lines on Stitcher


Between The Lines Presentation at the Left Forum 2016

"How Do We Build A Mass Movement to Reverse Runaway Inequality?" with Les Leopold, author of "Runaway Inequality: An Activist's Guide to Economic Justice,"May 22, 2016, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, The City University of New York, 860 11th Ave. (Between 58th and 59th), New York City. Between The Lines' Scott Harris and Richard Hill moderated this workshop. Listen to the audio/slideshows and more from this workshop.

Listen to audio of the plenary sessions from the weekend.

JEREMY SCAHILL: Oscar-nominated documentary filmmaker "Dirty Wars"

Listen to the full interview (30:33) with Jeremy Scahill, an award-winning investigative journalist with the Nation Magazine, correspondent for Democracy Now! and author of the bestselling book, "Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army," about America's outsourcing of its military. In an exclusive interview with Counterpoint's Scott Harris on Sept. 16, 2013, Scahill talks about his latest book, "Dirty Wars, The World is a Battlefield," also made into a documentary film under the same title, and was nominated Dec. 5, 2013 for an Academy Award in the Best Documentary Feature category.

Listen to Scott Harris Live on WPKN Radio

Between The Lines' Executive Producer Scott Harris hosts a live, weekly talk show, Counterpoint, from which some of Between The Lines' interviews are excerpted. Listen every Monday evening from 8 to 10 p.m. EDT at (Follows the 5-7 minute White Rose Calendar.)

Counterpoint in its entirety is archived after midnight ET Monday nights, and is available for at least a year following broadcast in WPKN Radio's Archives.

You can also listen to full unedited interview segments from Counterpoint, which are generally available some time the day following broadcast.

Subscribe to Counterpoint bulletins via our subscriptions page.

Between The Lines Blog  BTL Blog

"The Rogue World Order: Connecting the Dots Between Trump, Flynn, Bannon, Spencer, Dugin Putin," by Anna Manzo (GlobalHealing), Daily Kos, Feb. 13, 2017

"Widespread Resistance Begins to Trump's Muslim Travel Ban at U.S. Airports," by Anna Manzo (GlobalHealing), Daily Kos, Jan. 28, 2017

"MSNBC Editor: Women's March is a Revival of the Progressive Movement," by Anna Manzo (GlobalHealing), Daily Kos, Jan. 24, 2017

"Cornering Trump," by Reginald Johnson, Jan. 19, 2017

"Free Leonard Peltier," by Reginald Johnson, Jan. 6, 2016

"For Natives, a "Day of Mourning"by Reginald Johnson, November 23, 2016

"A Bitter Harvest" by Reginald Johnson, Nov. 15, 2016

Special Programming Special Programming

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Between The Lines Progressive Resources

A compilation of activist and news sites with a progressive point of view

Share this content:


Podcasts Subscribe to BTL

Podcasts:  direct  or  via iTunes

Subscribe to Program Summaries, Interview Transcripts or Counterpoint via email or RSS feed

If you have other questions regarding subscriptions, feeds or podcasts/mp3s go to our Audio Help page.

Between The Lines Blog

Stay connected to BTL

RSS feed  twitter  facebook

donate  Learn how to support our efforts!

Trump Department of Justice Prepares to Sue Universities Over "Discrimination" Against White Applicants

Posted Aug. 9, 2017

MP3 Interview with Brenda Shum, director of the Educational Opportunities Project at the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, conducted by Scott Harris


News reports indicate that the Trump administration is preparing to redirect resources within the Department of Justice civil rights division to launch investigations and possibly initiate lawsuits against universities over affirmative action admissions policies that they determine discriminate against white applicants.

In a 4 to 3 ruling in a 2016 affirmative action university admissions case, the Supreme Court upheld a race-conscious program at the University of Texas at Austin. However, current lawsuits challenging similar university admissions policies favoring diversity on campus have targeted Harvard University and the University of North Carolina.

The project to investigate alleged discrimination against white university applicants will be run by Trump political appointees at the Justice Department, not career civil servants who normally handle cases involving higher education institutions. This follows a pattern at the Trump Justice Department, where policy decisions on issues of voting rights, discrimination against the LGBTQ community and police misconduct appear to be driven by a white nationalist ideology. Between The Lines’ Scott Harris spoke Brenda Shum, director of the Educational Opportunities Project at the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, who explains why civil rights groups across the country challenge the veracity of “reverse discrimination” charges, and plan to oppose government Trump administration litigation attacking university policies promoting diversity. [Rush transcript.]

BRENDA SHUM: This move by the Justice Department to assemble a team of attorneys who are being asked to investigate and challenge race-based admissions really signals another step forward in this administration's pretty aggressive campaign to roll back civil rights protections for some of our most historically disadvantaged students and that includes transgender youth, women and girls and students of color.

I think it's important for your listeners to view this move in context with other evidence that the Justice Department is departing from its core mission of protecting the civil rights of all citizens, including those related to voting, employment, policing and immigration.

This newest assault on affirmative action in higher education ignores the law; it ignores a growing body of social science research on the educational benefits of integrative learning environments and more importantly. It is out of step with our entrenched history of segregated education and the variety of ways in which it continues to impact the experience of students today.

BETWEEN THE LINES: I would ask you to respond that there are white applicants who are victims of reverse discrimination. How do you assess charges that white applicants for colleges and universities across the U.S. are meeting with some strong headwinds and can't get into college?

BRENDA SHUM: That's an important question and before I address that, I want to be very clear that just last year, the Supreme Court validated the constitutionality of race-based admission policies as long as they're applied in a holistic and narrowly tailored way. In Fisher v. Texas, our highest court reaffirmed that universities are entitled to use rates as one of many factors in order to achieve the educational benefits of diversity entirely consistent with the law and the Constitution. We understand that there are a number of those who believe that affirmative action should be equated with an unfair advantage and that is simply untrue.

If you take a look at the empirical data, it very clearly demonstrates that the admission policies which have been challenged – those at the University of Texas, those which are currently being challenged at Harvard and the University of North Carolina – race is just one of many factors that is considered by a university when trying to make a determination about how to diversify its student body.

Racial diversity is just one aspect of what a university is considering. It is not the only factor that is determinative of what decisions are made with respect to offers of admission.

BETWEEN THE LINES: And as to the plans of the Justice Department, I would assume that there is no real ability to pre-empt what they may be planning in terms of lawsuits against universities. But, groups like yours, I imagine, can intervene and support the institutions that may be on the attack list of the DOJ. Is that right?

BRENDA SHUM: Absolutely, and I think that this is a really good opportunity for me to just mention for your listeners' benefit that this strategy that's being adopted by the Department of Justice really marks a departure from their tactics in previous administrations and not just the Obama administration. The Department of Justice has never initiated litigation related to race-based admission. Those are normally brought by private parties and at most, the Department of Justice may decide to file a statement of interest or may decide to file a motion to intervene.

Moving forward, the Lawyers' Committee is in the process of developing a strategy to issue a variety of public information records request, some voyeur request where we are going to be seeking information to try to insert some level of transparency into the department's agenda. And we look forward to being able to share that information with the public once it becomes available.

For more information, visit Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law at

Related Links:

Subscribe and get Between The Lines' Weekly Summary in your inbox!